Now, there is a lot that can be said, and has been said, about misogyny in hip-hop. Love Hurts is an article from Vibe magazine that was linked to in Feministing about domestic violence in hip hop culture that is much more well researched and thought out than I'm ready to do at this point. There is a long tradition in hip-hop and R&B around objectifying women, and talking about "smacking my bitch up" or "keeping hoes in line". There are many hip hop artists that worked their way up from hustling on the street, and have told their stories in music. And there are more hip hop artists, and kids who've grown up on hip hop, who have learned the language and emulated the attitudes they've seen portrayed. There is an interesting point in the Vibe article about how women in African American communities have had more success than men in certain aspects, and that an emasculation in one area can lead to a sense of needing to be hyper-masculine in other areas, including "keeping your woman in line". Kevin Powell refers to this as "Bootleg Masculinity" (You might remember him from the first season of The Real World. He wrote an essay about ending violence against women that can be read here). But this really deserves a separate post.
Anyhow....that is a long walk to get to this quote from the LA Times article about how the assault by Chris Brown against Rihanna might impact the stars:
Although Rihanna has not been accused of doing anything wrong, some companies may shun her as well, she said.
"The reason why she has been used as a celebrity endorser is that she represents something very positive and in particular a strong female role model, and when she is associated with a situation like this it can have an impact," Green said.
What pisses me off is the idea that somehow being the victim of domestic violence makes Rhianna no longer a good role model. As one of my friends in my other blog put it....would it make her a better role model to sit back and take it and not speak up? What are we to take from this kind of thinking? Does this imply that Rihanna did something to deserve it?
One of the fallacies in the cycle of domestic violence is both parties believing that the victim
But beyond who is or is not to blame, is the concept that "good girls don't". Good girls don't get beaten or raped, that it only happens to other people, bad people who make bad choices (which gets us back up to this power that women are supposed to wield over men, but only in ways that make men behave badly). This is why rape and domestic violence goes so underreported, victims are afraid of what other people will think of them. There are massive ammounts of shame that survivors of domestic violence and rape often experience because they are afraid tha they are "damaged goods". We tell survivors that "it's not your fault" and that "it doesn't change who you are".
So, what's a "strong female role model" to do? This can get into an interesting breakdown of the venn diagram that is identity politics. For instance, I am a libreral, I am a feminist (these are pretty strongly overlapping circles), I am also pro-organized labor and come from a working class background (now we see some divergence). I can't speak from experience about groups I don't belong to, but I can imagine how there would be pressure from different groups to go
What is unfortunate is that not matter what Rihanna chooses to do in response to this violence, we are seeing writ large in the media these attitudes towards domestic violence and survivors. Regardless how how she chooses to respond, we are being told that Rihanna is no longer considered a "strong female role model" by those in charge because (allegedly) her boyfriend chose to beat her up. It reinforces all of those messages about being the victim's fault, and that somehow the victim is a bad person because of what someone else chose to do to them. It's just so victim-blaming and it makes me angry.
PS Feministing also has a great breakdown of Chris Brown's dad's statement to the media.
PPS. I know that men are victims of domestic violence and rape, and that there are as many forms of "person on person" violence as there are ways to permutate that dynamic. I don't mean to be heteronormative, but this is a good example of the "stereotypical relationship" and illustrates the mainstream culture's view of relationships and relationship violence.
PPPS. I am not entirely comfortable with my use of terms like victim, and domestic violence because I don't nessisarily think they're the best terms. But they're the ones we use most commonly, so that's what I used here. Expect to see some writing on the concepts of victim and survivor and what naming means and how it can get all sticky and lead to multiple post scrips on a blog post in ANOTHER blog post.
PPPPS. I was thinking about Tina Turner as I wrote this, and how she was able to overcome her abuse by Ike. I would have to read a LOT more to really speak intellegently about it, but her career also struggled immediately after leaving Ike, and the wiki mentioned that she was considered "unmarketable" for a significant time in the US, while still successfully touring abroad. It would be interesting to see if there is any information about differences in attitude towards domestic violence in europe vs the US and how that might have played into this dichotomy, or if the european audience had been unaware of her personal struggles.
No comments:
Post a Comment